Asrock X99 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 WS  (all builds)
Memory120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 00:36
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 211
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 675
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 37.3
32% 39.9 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 39.4
34% 42.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 296 294 295 295 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 445
Mixed 420
SusWrite 295
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 52.4
168% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 25.4
91% 204 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
397GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 296 294 295 295 294 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 430
Mixed 404
SusWrite 295
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 47.7
171% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 137%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
331GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 297 294 295 295 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 441
Mixed 402
SusWrite 295
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 42.8
155% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 100%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
293GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 355 354 357 359 359 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 227
Mixed 271
SusWrite 358
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 41.2
146% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 244
210% 311 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 43.4
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 22.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 WS Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $464
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback