Huananzhi X99-8M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuananzhi X99-8M  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 19:15
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 800
70% 595 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 78.8
43% 64.3 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 44.9
45% 56 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 19 77 22 55 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 488
Write 390
Mixed 26
SusWrite 95
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 1
48% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 1.1
65% 151 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 120 121 114 119 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 79.3
Write 98.4
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 118
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 106%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 165 168 165 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 168
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 166
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HNMI8GD4240D0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 75 21.7" 1280 720 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical X99-8M Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Huananzhi X99-8M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback