Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110705
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 02:50
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 86.9
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 92.6
50% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 192
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 21.4
17% 20.5 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.1
17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSA2BW120G3 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 21 19 15 14 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 169
Write 116
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 31.9
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 16.7
56% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 49.5
DQ Mixed 18.8
19% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
46GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 74 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 89
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 72.6
54% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
154GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 113
Write 115
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 96.3
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELD047 DELL U2212HM
Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback