Lenovo 90Q70009UT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90Q70009UT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3307
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 22:47
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 276
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 912
88% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,297
80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3307) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 9.8
5% 8.67 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 12.1
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L1 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 994 349 347 349 344 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,143
Write 1,086
Mixed 943
SusWrite 580
210% 938 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55.2
185% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 764
507% 613 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 163%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 22.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 42.5" 1280 720 ACR06C5 DM431K
Typical 90Q70009UT Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90Q70009UT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback