Monster ABRA A7 V7.1

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Monster ABRA A7 V7.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER ABRA A7 V7.1
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 22:03
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 378 40% 319 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Clevo(1558 850A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Lighting 31.1 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 31.6 25% 31.1 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 20.5 23% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB 10,917 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 149 149 147 144 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 438 Mixed 368 SusWrite 172 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 94.6 4K Mixed 51.6 176% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 346 264% 356 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 116%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 322GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 115 114 115 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 63.7 Write 64.3 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 115 53% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21.1 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 20.5 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	12%	16	179	29	60	17.2"	1920 1080	CMN1738

History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 6: 1R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ABRA A7 V7.1 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V7.1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	102x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	67x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	36x

SSD
Green SATA M.2 240GBWD $76Bench 52%, 5,323 samples	17x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	6x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	10x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	10x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 39%, 1,390 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $76

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16