TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

ECS H61H2-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS H61H2-M2  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110309
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '15 at 16:11
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 156
53% 117 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 304
41% 304 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 50% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Asus(1043 8450) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5850
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 1.75
2% 2.22 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.93%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 55.5
Mixed 58.1
44% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.24
60% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 33.3%
 Great: 40%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
38GB free, PID 0571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 30
Write 24
Mixed 4.24
22% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 12.9%
 Great: 19%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H61H2-M2 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M2 - $125

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel  $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples97x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples62x
Core i5-2310Intel  $90Bench 65%, 15,623 samples56x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples129x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples57x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples33x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples48x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples16x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples16x
RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples14x
99U5471-002.A01LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 45%, 627 samples13x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback