Lenovo 20C0S0YE1N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20C0S0YE1N  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C0S0YE1N
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140911
Uptime154.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 14:31
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 51.1
2-Core 88.4
46% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 140
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2217) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.9
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 255 258 248 292 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 393
Write 302
Mixed 270
SusWrite 265
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 19.5
90% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 220
182% 262 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 129%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 84.5
Write 17.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 11.2
34% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
101% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.3% Average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 12.5" 1280 720 LEN40E4
Typical 20C0S0YE1N Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20C0S0YE1N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback