Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$206
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 920
91% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.7% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 60.1
52% 63.1 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 60
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 137 138 136 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 471
Write 134
Mixed 160
SusWrite 133
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 24.2
118% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 118
102% 152 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 75%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2.5TB
99GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 115 58 97 69 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
62% Good
Read 121
Write 108
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 95
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62%
Great: 102%
WD WD800ADFD-75NLR1 80GB
32GB free
Firmware: 20.07P20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 53 53 50 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 69
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 52.6
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.8
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 34.5
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,034
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback