LG *NP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLG *NP  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7619
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 13:02
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 158
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 380
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 2.8
6% 6.63 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 3.7
4% 5.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 73 76 74 66 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.6% Below average
Read 212
Write 78.1
Mixed 116
SusWrite 73.9
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 14.1
64% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 16.2
24% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
464GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 72 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72.4
Write 74.2
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 72.2
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical *NP Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: LG *NP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback