Gigabyte GA-Z390 M-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 M
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 M-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 08:24
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 215
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 631
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 79%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 27.4
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD SS2561AP012 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 83 69 75 77 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.9% Very good
Read 436
Write 206
Mixed 322
SusWrite 118
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 33.8
137% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 176
156% 232 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
448GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 141 141 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 124
Mixed 30
SusWrite 140
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
148% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 108%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 177 190 181 185 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 186
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1
295% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.9" 1280 720 ACR062D Acer KG281K
Typical GA-Z390 M-CF Builds (Compare 1,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 M-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback