PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Biostar H61MGV3 (all builds) |
Memory | 7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140320 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 13 '21 at 05:57 |
Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
Run User | GEO-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
78.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 1706 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Дисковый накопитель 500GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 66 53 75 82 82 MB/s
|
43.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 99P5474-014.A00LF Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 8GB
1400, 1400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
57.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 82x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 65x |
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 94x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 28x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |