Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9230 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 148 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 43 1-Core 52.5 2-Core 85.3 36% 60.3 Pts	4-Core 83.5 8-Core 81 11% 82.2 Pts	64-Core 77.8 5% 77.8 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8373) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 4.3 2% 3.83 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 3.4 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 108 134 93 79 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 425 Write 252 Mixed 309 SusWrite 118 61% 276 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 30.7 112% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 158 118% 158 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 91%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.1 10 10 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	4.49% Terrible	Read 10.6 Write 12.1 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 10.2 15% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.49% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-015.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.5% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 6 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16