Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '21 at 15:20
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 198 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 661 63% 519 Pts	64-Core 1136 70% 1136 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Zotac(19DA 8617) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	150% Outstanding	Lighting 221 Reflection 207 Parallax 216 180% 215 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 155 Splatting 138 130% 162 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU760 1TB 966 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: XA001R30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 41 86 25 52 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 402 Write 64.2 Mixed 104 SusWrite 51.4 34% 156 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 26.8 102% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 149 129% 192 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 401GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 110 109 110 110 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 181 Write 180 Mixed 97.8 SusWrite 109 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.3% Very good	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 24.3 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 36.6 SC Mixed 26.7 84% 29.3 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 19: 3R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	20%	35	108	6	100	34.2"	3440 1440	LHC3500 GNV34DW

History: Score 28: 2R 5G 3B | Score 19: 3R 0G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	817x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	747x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	773x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	414x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	347x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	259x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	197x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	145x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $418

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16