HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '21 at 12:09
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 73 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 199 69% 124 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 384 52% 384 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3397) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$130 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 202 202 205 201 199 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.5% Above average	Read 209 Write 97.1 Mixed 200 SusWrite 200 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 28.3 91% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 77.7 DQ Mixed 44.5 37% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 169GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 70 70 71 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 110 Write 92.2 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 70.5 59% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 4x8GB 804 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 17.5 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	5	3	0	60	21.5"	1920 1080	ACR01AA S211HL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,468x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,466x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	798x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,923x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	726x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	490x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
MX500 1TBCrucial $80Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16