Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '21 at 04:04
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	PAN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B60 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 56% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 96.9 50% 77.1 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 196 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4290 1,024 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8454) 640MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZM100-41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 45 47 45 39 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 47 Write 52.4 Mixed 33 SusWrite 44.1 32% 44.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 33%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB 8,028 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 99GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 56 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 32.4 Write 32.7 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 56 26% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 52%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 177GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 83 83 82 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 94.6 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 82.5 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.2 176% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 77%
USB2.0 (FS) FLASH DISK 0GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.68% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 12% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.68% Great: 1%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	6.15% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 10 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 4.1 14% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 69% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.15% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564568FH8N0QHSCG SH564568FH8N0QHSCG 9905458-009.A00LF 9905458-009.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 0.2 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16