Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '21 at 23:39
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 131 61% 97.1 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 285 32% 250 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36D2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1442 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33% Below average	Lighting 42 Reflection 45.6 Parallax 40.7 34% 42.8 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 35.7 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 127 36 33 35 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 385 Write 341 Mixed 126 SusWrite 86.2 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 12.1 41% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 56%
Intenso SATAIII 256GB 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 25GB free Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 83 74 93 48 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 459 Write 370 Mixed 370 SusWrite 125 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 25 111% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 42 81% 162 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB 3,028 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 21.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 14.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	21.5"	1280 720	AOC2200 F22

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	381x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16