Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 128
61% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 284
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.9% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 45.1
Parallax 40.3
34% 42.4 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 35.3
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 69 32 29 42 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 417
Write 308
Mixed 274
SusWrite 79
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 13.7
62% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 90.8
DQ Mixed 19.3
37% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 56%
Intenso SATAIII 256GB
25GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 82 56 41 62 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 451
Write 379
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 101
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 12.4
57% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 1.2
60% 143 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 18
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2200 F22
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback