Lenovo 20378

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20378  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 18:41
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 158
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 408
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Legend(17AA 3978) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 19
17% 18.2 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 15
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 38 39 46 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 46.7
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 39.2
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
49GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.1 8.1 8.1 6 6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 124
Write 16.1
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 7.9
43% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
92% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4852
Typical 20378 Builds (Compare 2,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback