Lenovo 82CU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82CU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 281
86% 163 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 718
70% 576 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 381A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 30.5
22% 28.8 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 21.1
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1562 1462 1381 1598 1354 1205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,747
Write 1,862
Mixed 1,850
SusWrite 1,427
388% 1,721 MB/s
4K Read 73.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 69.7
258% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 972
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 802
562% 723 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 267%
Great: 404%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D2NP-046 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 59.7
MC Mixed 38.9
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 17.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 119%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 5% 84 276 192 60 13.3" 1280 800 LEN8197
History: Score 9: 0R 2G 3B | Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 8: 0R 2G 2B
Typical 82CU Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82CU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback