Asrock B450M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime14 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 17:57
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 76.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 287
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 792
82% 662 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 42.7
37% 43.9 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 44
Splatting 28.8
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1001 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 75 92 90 64 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 315
Mixed 322
SusWrite 86.2
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 49.1
176% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 224
184% 266 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 92%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
148GB free
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 141 210 101 112 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 501
Write 412
Mixed 145
SusWrite 178
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 34.5
122% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 174
137% 196 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 28.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 8R 2G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 49% 39 320 261 60 21.5" 1920 1080 AVX0039 AVT GC311
Typical B450M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 8,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $472
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback