Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 22:58
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 180
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 357
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 63.5
54% 65.8 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 61.8
53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 219 23 86 14 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 384
Write 37.4
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 106
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 5.7
36% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 77.6
73% 113 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G160081 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 22" 1280 720 SAM027F SyncMaster
Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback