Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemOegstone Q87M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 11:51
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 582
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.8% Good
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 86.5
61% 84.1 fps
MRender 79.6
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 71.1
61% 75.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 73 68 112 33 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 124
Write 71.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 92.8
19% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 8.3
35% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 11.9
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 11.9
9% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 85%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
146GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 426 313 329 427 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 408
Mixed 403
SusWrite 392
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 30.5
140% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 47.5
109% 224 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
150GB free
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 133 55 74 61 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 496
Write 388
Mixed 50
SusWrite 155
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 0.7
58% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 0.9
56% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.7% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 5R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 26% 50 105 1 60 27.9" 1920 1080 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
History: Score 33: 3R 4G 6B | Score 37: 5R 2G 6B
Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback