Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive440% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 00:52
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 205
2-Core 406
124% 235 Pts
4-Core 817
8-Core 1255
128% 1,036 Pts
64-Core 1,838
114% 1,838 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 124%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.22001.14011
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 147
Parallax 214
116% 168 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 148
Splatting 99.2
98% 122 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
910GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3380 3185 1789 1808 1793 1790 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
440% Outstanding
Read 2,871
Write 3,457
Mixed 3,128
SusWrite 2,291
664% 2,937 MB/s
4K Read 85.3
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 124
413% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,633
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 1,318
966% 1,284 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 440%
Great: 526%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
435GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1880 1700 1711 1704 1699 1492 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,588
Write 2,015
Mixed 1,770
SusWrite 1,698
452% 2,018 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 100
336% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,729
DQ Write 871
DQ Mixed 1,465
1,044% 1,355 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 370%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2173 2226 2164 1898 1270 1296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,594
Write 2,259
Mixed 1,705
SusWrite 1,838
471% 2,099 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 103
340% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,769
DQ Write 959
DQ Mixed 1,478
1,069% 1,402 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 383%
Great: 435%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$224
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 488 488 488 488 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 484
Mixed 457
SusWrite 488
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 63.4
212% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 346
260% 349 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4400C19-16GTZR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 55.5
MC Mixed 33.7
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 51.3
SC Mixed 38.5
113% 39.5 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 34.1" 1280 720 AUS346A XG349C
Typical GA-Z590 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 213%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback