Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive509% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 15:52
Run Duration358 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 206
2-Core 410
125% 237 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,189
111% 924 Pts
64-Core 1,786
111% 1,786 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.22017.1004
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 150
Parallax 242
118% 179 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 150
Splatting 101
99% 124 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 110%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
919GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3115 3355 3364 3437 3421 3423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
509% Outstanding
Read 3,035
Write 3,402
Mixed 3,096
SusWrite 3,352
728% 3,222 MB/s
4K Read 83.4
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 122
405% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 1,625
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 1,413
1,018% 1,328 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 509%
Great: 526%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
429GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1857 1696 1708 1704 1709 1615 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,590
Write 2,348
Mixed 1955
SusWrite 1,715
483% 2,152 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 96.6
330% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1745
DQ Write 1,547
DQ Mixed 1,598
1,211% 1,630 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 383%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2364 2319 2332 1864 1489 1513 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2,596
Write 2,292
Mixed 1,987
SusWrite 1,980
497% 2,214 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 94.4
330% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1758
DQ Write 1,553
DQ Mixed 1,610
1,220% 1,640 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 400%
Great: 435%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 484 484 484 484 483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 480
Mixed 436
SusWrite 484
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 60.3
203% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 346
260% 349 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4400C19-16GTZR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 32.9
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 38.1
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 34.1" 1280 720 AUS346A XG349C
Typical GA-Z590 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 213%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback