PC Recoil

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPC Recoil  (all builds)
MotherboardTong GK5CP0Z
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 13:42
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 204
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 424
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 105F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 84.7
Parallax 7.2
5% 32.8 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 428 425 406 400 393 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,644
Write 468
Mixed 434
SusWrite 420
162% 741 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 44.5
162% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 616
470% 639 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 170%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
71GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,751
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,195
327% 1,473 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 66.8
222% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 794
598% 802 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 4R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 16% 43 81 41 144 15.5" 1536 864 AUO82ED
History: Score 10: 2R 0G 0B | Score 12: 1R 1G 4B | Score 25: 4R 1G 2B
Typical Recoil Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: PC Recoil

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $74
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback