HP 700-400z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-400z  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '15 at 19:25
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 111
38% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 205
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 35% Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
EVGA(3842 C959) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4181
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 0.81
2% 2.49 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 3.04
2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 165
Write 145
Mixed 129
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.21
76% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
213GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 59.3
Mixed 60.1
45% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.18
75% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 63%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB
326GB free, PID 0143
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 26.7
Mixed 26.5
34% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.35
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 17%
SDHC Card 8GB
3GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 8.79
Mixed 11.2
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
5% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 10%
Typical 700-400z Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 700-400z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback