Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 154% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 149% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200415
Uptime	25.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '21 at 23:44
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 115 2-Core 230 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 750 72% 594 Pts	64-Core 1,210 75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% MSI(1462 3896); BG-3080C10-MS0 CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	189% Outstanding	Lighting 274 Reflection 255 Parallax 290 223% 273 fps	MRender 312 Gravity 229 Splatting 172 187% 238 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 202%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 1TB 2,962 User benchmarks, average bench 227% 567GB free (System drive) Firmware: STPSC014 SusWrite @10s intervals: 771 821 896 845 836 829 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,300 Write 2,235 Mixed 1,018 SusWrite 833 304% 1,347 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 43.3 147% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 864 DQ Write 633 DQ Mixed 757 563% 751 MB/s
Poor: 151% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 296%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	74.2% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 22.6 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 23.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	144	27"	2560 1377	DELD0E6 S2719DGF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,862x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,481x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,390x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	513x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	502x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	442x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	357x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	262x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	223x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	277x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	183x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $813

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16