Fujitsu ESPRIMO A525-L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO A525-L  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3313-F1
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-222GC SOC R5E Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Memory 36.4
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 65
28% 45.9 Pts
4-Core 67.8
8-Core 64.3
9% 66.1 Pts
64-Core 69.3
4% 69.3 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5E Graphics
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1202) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 3.1
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.8
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMSA230S 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0TBD1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 110 111 109 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 413
Write 370
Mixed 353
SusWrite 139
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 33
108% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 95.6
83% 123 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST9160827AS 160GB
115GB free
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 55.5
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 55
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 6% 79 29 22 60 17" 1280 1024 SAM01B7 SyncMaster
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 9: 0R 2G 3B
Typical ESPRIMO A525-L Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO A525-L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback