Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A75M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 14:02
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 641
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 86.8
40% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 173
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 10
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.77 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.8
6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 72 83 83 31 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 228
Write 152
Mixed 140
SusWrite 105
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 17.4
72% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 31.6
DQ Mixed 30.7
22% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 90%
Asrock RAM Disk 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,602
Write 1,260
Mixed 1,663
337% 1,508 MB/s
4K Read 165
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 150
518% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 460
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 140
182% 328 MB/s
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
642GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 48.6
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 52.7
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 2R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 20% 56 52 13 60 18.5" 1366 768 PHLC04E Philips 192EL
Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback