Samsung 450R4E/450R5E/450R4V/450R5V/4450RV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 46% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 450R4E/450R5E/450R4V/450R5V/4450RV  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP450R5E-X04RU
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 18:54
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 65.2
38% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 83.9
8-Core 83.6
11% 83.8 Pts
64-Core 83.1
5% 83.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C711) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2963
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 232 231 219 228 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 254
Write 231
Mixed 212
SusWrite 228
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 11.5
71% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 21.6
53% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 450R4E/450R5E/450R4V/450R5V/4450RV Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 450R4E/450R5E/450R4V/450R5V/4450RV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback