Intel H61M-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte H61M-S2P
MotherboardIntel H61M-S2P  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111219
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 12:06
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G620 @ 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 43
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 135
45% 82 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 131
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gainward(10B0 104A) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 23 23 24 28 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 14.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 23.8
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 35%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
51GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 75 81 81 81 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 82
Write 61.3
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 77.7
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5458-011.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-S2P Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61M-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback