Asus H61M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-E  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 08:43
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 157
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 397
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 102
87% 106 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 102
Splatting 99
81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 191 231 227 218 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.7% Good
Read 253
Write 237
Mixed 177
SusWrite 211
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 28.6
101% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 125
112% 169 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
5TB free
Firmware: MF8OAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 113 115 114 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 111
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 94%
Sandisk SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 1TB
330GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 195 238 236 237 241 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 256
Write 240
Mixed 239
SusWrite 222
178% 240 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 40.5
6,843% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 198
1,818% 199 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 27" 1280 720 STD0001 27MD845 V4
Typical H61M-E Builds (Compare 1,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-E - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback