Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus ProArt StudioBook W730G5TV_W730G5T (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK W730G5TV
Memory	121.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	504 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 02:18
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2276M 1,872 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 73.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 274 78% 150 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 799 80% 649 Pts	64-Core 926 57% 926 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A51) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.4% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 149 Parallax 9 5% 54.8 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 14 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.4% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS400T3X0C-00SJG0 4TB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 296% 3.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 114000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 2087 2105 1925 1412 1353 1516 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 1421 Write 1,480 Mixed 1,243 SusWrite 1,733 332% 1,469 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 210 4K Mixed 74.5 277% 110 MB/s	DQ Read 982 DQ Write 873 DQ Mixed 896 681% 917 MB/s
Poor: 194% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 367%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G4x4 NVMe 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 360% 420GB free Firmware: EGFM52.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1419 1258 1123 1262 657 534 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 612 Write 1,334 Mixed 753 SusWrite 1,042 213% 935 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 71.2 243% 88.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,080 DQ Write 922 DQ Mixed 1,007 753% 1,003 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 593%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 859B CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 859B CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 127GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 26.9 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 24.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	16.9"	1280 720	HSD1702

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
Xeon E-2276MIntelBench 82%, 1,872 samples	32x

GPU
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 96%, 1,190 samples	17x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	15x

SSD
Raid 0 Volume 4TBIntelBench 427%, 1,660 samples	14x
WDS400T3X0C-00SJG0 4TBBench 296%, 121 samples	6x
SSDPEKKW010T8 1TBIntelBench 248%, 3,058 samples	4x

RAM
76.D305G.D880B 4x16GBApacerBench 85%, 58 samples	20x
CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 859B CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 859B CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 127GBUnknownBench 79%, 8 samples	8x
J644GU44J2320NF 4x31.8GBUnknownBench 82%, 9 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16