TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Pcspecialist Intel Lga3647 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPcspecialist Intel Lga3647 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory244.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 23:13
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5220R
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 231
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 714
64% 541 Pts
64-Core 2606
161% 2606 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 73.8%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Asus(1043 8802)
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 297
Parallax 310
249% 304 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 255
Splatting 191
210% 267 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 209%
 Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1616 1508 1491 1479 1476 1479 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,751
Write 1,718
Mixed 1,610
SusWrite 1,508
371% 1,647 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 61.8
212% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 666
492% 650 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 256%
 Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
466GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 325 325 325 325 326 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 401
Mixed 389
SusWrite 325
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 43.4
155% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 357
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 130%
Seagate ST10000NE0008-2JM101 10TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 242 246 245 241 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 112%
Seagate ST10000NE0008-2JM101 10TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 249 249 251 253 256 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965640-054.C00G 8x31.9GB
8 of 12 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
115% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 59.4
MC Mixed 42.4
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 124%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 32" 1280 720 AUS3264 PA329C
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Intel Lga3647 Workstation Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist Intel Lga3647 Workstation

CPU
Xeon Gold 5220RIntelBench 73%, 12 samples2x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5220R1stBench 74%, 35 samples2x
GPU
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples2x
RTX 2080Nvidia  $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples1x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1x
SSD
FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30023 2TBSeagateBench 436%, 1,161 samples1x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBIntel  $550Bench 327%, 3,198 samples1x
RAM
9965694-041.B00G 4x31.8GBKingstonBench 86%, 8 samples1x
9965640-054.C00G 8x31.9GBKingstonBench 107%, 3 samples1x
9965694-041.B00G 6x31.8GBKingstonBench 104%, 2 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $660
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback