MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 18:41
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 820
86% 688 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 2783) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.6% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 68.2
44% 60 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 49
Splatting 52.2
46% 56.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 138 39 18 21 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 421
Write 282
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 65
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 10.6
44% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 20.1
15% 21.4 MB/s
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$44
215GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 319 316 318 318 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 474
Mixed 381
SusWrite 326
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 55.4
188% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
390GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 415 418 426 428 385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 424
SusWrite 412
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 57.9
192% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Intel SSDPE2MX012T7 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: MDV10271
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1225 1228 1233 1227 1228 1231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 275
Write 1,231
Mixed 416
SusWrite 1,228
181% 788 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 40.3
173% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 998
782% 1,073 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 187%
Great: 209%
Patriot Memory 8GB
3GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.9 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3
5% 4.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.4
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 120 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA7 MSI MAG274R
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $756
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback