Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-V  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 17:35
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 519
58% 457 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 78.6
46% 64.5 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 42.7
43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,461
Write 2,878
Mixed 3,436
796% 3,592 MB/s
4K Read 307
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 164
765% 213 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 569
441% 613 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
138GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 93 90 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 122
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 91.8
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.3
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-153.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 25.5" 1280 720 ACI26A4 ASUS VW266H
Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback