HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F9
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 23:02
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 298
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 664
73% 578 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
HP(103C 88F9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.9% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 45.2
38% 49.6 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 45.4
35% 41.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG60ZNV256G KIOXIA 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1058 392 395 385 398 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,912
Write 1,587
Mixed 1,179
SusWrite 506
289% 1,296 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 79.7
286% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 774
595% 803 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 232%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 16.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 16" 1280 720 CMN1606
Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx Builds (Compare 4,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback