Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 22:23
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 653
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 2036 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Lighting 97.8
Reflection 91.1
Parallax 82.3
80% 90.4 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 83
Splatting 75
62% 74.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,529
Write 2,281
Mixed 1,620
476% 2,143 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 73.5
240% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 596
DQ Mixed 821
595% 778 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
126GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 482 480 481 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 481
Mixed 415
SusWrite 482
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 54.9
182% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
SanDisk X110 64GB-$25
5GB free
Firmware: X230600
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 384
Write 111
Mixed 141
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 29.9
122% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 115
105% 165 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 79%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
143GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 152 168 168 167 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 184
Mixed 40
SusWrite 163
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 135 134 135 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 134
164% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 32.8
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 4R 7G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
53% 25% 92 234 142 164 31.5" 2560 1440 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
History: Score 16: 2R 1G 3B | Score 53: 4R 7G 12B
Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback