Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H57D-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120928
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '17 at 08:05
Run Duration	416 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.55 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 97.7 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 180 74% 123 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 455 52% 404 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Lighting 69.2 Reflection 69.9 Parallax 96.5 56% 78.5 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 57.2 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3178 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 524 (B1) Unknown 98 98 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 55 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 41 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6600104033	44.5% Average	Read 243 Write 129 Mixed 154 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 16.8 85% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 42.9 DQ Mixed 17.2 19% 30.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 115%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4591 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3252 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13641 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3037 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 254 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 90554 (C2) HDA temperature 125 105 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5558 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.4% Above average	Read 90.8 Write 88.2 Mixed 23.9 49% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.36 93% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 930GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 168 1200 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 201 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 812 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 172 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 39 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2467 (C2) HDA temperature 116 100 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	103% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 193 Mixed 177 135% 179 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 2.88 4K Mixed 0.38 148% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 109%
Spaceloop XL 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.18% Terrible	Read 16.6 Write 3.07 Mixed 5.18 8% 8.28 MB/s	4K Read 4.43 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 18% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.18% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 17.6 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 15.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 47.3 85% 47.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	37x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	32x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	30x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GBSeagateBench 117%, 6,074 samples	8x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	49x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369