Novatech PC-XB05174

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNovatech PC-XB05174  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H110M-S2H-CF
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 662
62% 513 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 7.9
6% 6.63 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4130012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 182 186 187 185 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 392
Write 245
Mixed 220
SusWrite 187
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 30.1
112% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 151
143% 228 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
21GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.4 7.3 7 7.2 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 0.2
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 6.4
9% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.4
81% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3E1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.3% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 17.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC-XB05174 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Novatech PC-XB05174

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback