PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B54h |
Memory | 17.9 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110311 |
Uptime | 17.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 04 '21 at 16:11 |
Run Duration | 332 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
65.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SV300S37A 240G 240GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1025A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 207 205 209 209 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
476GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 186 185 188 189 MB/s
|
91.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 138 141 141 142 MB/s
|
76.1%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
24GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 15 11 MB/s
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 60 | 23" | 1600 1024 | AUS23CC VZ239 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 298x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 274x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 255x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 145x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 124x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 99x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 53x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |