Lenovo 30A4S04600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30A4S04600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1031
Memory239.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 14:29
Run Duration475 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 644
60% 500 Pts
64-Core 3,132
194% 3,132 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 219
Parallax 142
121% 170 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 174
Splatting 123
116% 143 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 115%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1761 1517 1502 1537 1519 1516 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,138
Write 1,970
Mixed 1,559
SusWrite 1,559
406% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 63.2
208% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 445
334% 450 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 266%
Great: 372%
HPT DISK 0_0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2355 2383 2379 2335 2384 2374 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
501GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 949 953 947 962 943 957 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,014
Write 946
Mixed 928
SusWrite 952
216% 960 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 59.8
197% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 559
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 460
351% 477 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 182%
Great: 372%
Avago MR9364-8i 20TB
13.5TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 385 297 310 311 336 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 22% Great: 22%
Spcc Solid State 1TB
865GB free
Firmware: 3A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 17 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 462
Write 411
Mixed 357
SusWrite 15.9
69% 312 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 83.3
DQ Write 5.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
11% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 95%
Samsung MZ7WD480 480GB
401GB free
Firmware: 203Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 438 437 439 437 439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 346
Write 423
Mixed 319
SusWrite 438
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 36.2
125% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 264
203% 276 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 36ASF4G72P... 255GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
32767, 32767, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 32767, 32767, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.5% Good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 24
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 4R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 29% 52 263 161 60 31.5" 2560 1440 LEN65F8 LEN C32q-20
History: Score 24: 1R 5G 4B | Score 37: 4R 3G 8B
Typical 30A4S04600 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

System: Lenovo 30A4S04600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $1,585
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback