Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '21 at 12:05
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 176 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 460 46% 371 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 861E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.3% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 136 Parallax 125 94% 126 fps	MRender 94.8 Gravity 125 Splatting 112 91% 111 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 695GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 35 36 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 821GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 93 100 96 105 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 68.2 Write 63.2 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 101 51% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.1 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	27"	1280 719	ACI27A3 ASUS PB278

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	387x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	205x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	131x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16