Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 342
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Lighting 83
Reflection 88
Parallax 77.5
68% 82.8 fps
MRender 79.1
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 68.8
61% 74.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 279 248 162 115 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 366
Write 320
Mixed 300
SusWrite 202
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 43.7
143% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 226
170% 230 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
100GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 56 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 49
Write 49.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 55
35% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
878GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 74.7
Write 70.8
Mixed 60
SusWrite 87.6
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
66GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 91 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 91
Write 95.2
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 92.8
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
33GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 27
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 11.7
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 67%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
33GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 25.8
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 11
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
8GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 24
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 10.8
27% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 89 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 71.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 89.7
102% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 3R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 13% 95 345 281 60 40.2" 1490 838 HEC4000 HDMI
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback