Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 25.3 1-Core 17 2-Core 99.1 24% 47.1 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 196 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 2.1 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 1.6 2% 1.47 fps	Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.4 2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NS550-2242 256GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1206A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 305 332 357 333 337 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 379 Write 325 Mixed 314 SusWrite 328 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 11.3 52% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 44.2 87% 171 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 284 14% 284 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	11x

SSD
256GB NS550-2242 256GBTeclastBench 54%, 255 samples	9x
MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 71%, 1,750 samples	1x
860 EVO M.2 1TBSamsungBench 110%, 27,887 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16