Aftershock N95TP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAftershock N95TP6  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock N95TP6
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180131
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 06:29
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 131
2-Core 184
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 656
66% 538 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Clevo(1558 951B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 7.4
5% 28.8 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aftershock 120GB M.2 SSD 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 65 68 69 80 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 103
Write 6.2
Mixed 330
SusWrite 63.7
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 14
70% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 0.7
35% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GS88N26-GIIHA0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO70ED
Typical N95TP6 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Aftershock N95TP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback