Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 01:26
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 182
2-Core 351
112% 208 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 890
96% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,264
78% 1,264 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB; sapphire pulse rx 6700 xt
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 135
Reflection 131
Parallax 284
110% 183 fps
Gravity 137
Splatting 163
135% 150 fps
Poor: 113% Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1994 191 201 260 188 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1692
Write 2191
Mixed 1,858
SusWrite 503
352% 1,561 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 96.6
336% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,562
DQ Write 1,293
DQ Mixed 1,416
1,064% 1,424 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 266%
Great: 365%
Pcie SSD 1TB
433GB free
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1836 1831 1843 1862 1857 1849 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,210
Write 1,837
Mixed 1,241
SusWrite 1,846
348% 1,534 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 73.6
255% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 1402
DQ Mixed 867
710% 985 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 287%
Great: 438%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
409GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 454 202 15 205 455 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 508
Write 458
Mixed 399
SusWrite 299
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 4.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 0.1
2% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 100%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 195 196 192 191 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 197
Mixed 102
SusWrite 194
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
250% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4B.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 26.6
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 32.8
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 5R 7G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 18% 92 107 3 75 34.1" 2560 1080 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO Builds (Compare 3,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $941
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback