bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
Motherboard X99-D8
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 14:10
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 194
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 713
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 1287
80% 1287 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 31.8
18% 27.3 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 20
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1391 1124 1144 1138 1158 1122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2230
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,513
SusWrite 1,180
388% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 69.8
223% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 439
DQ Mixed 629
452% 587 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 256%
Great: 372%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58
300GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 72.8
Write 66.8
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 68.9
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
5GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 12.7
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 11.8
21% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.7
106% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BAPC08G2666D4T8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.4% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 18.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 75 27" 1280 720 PHLC17F PHL 278E9Q
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback