Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M5910
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1228 x 676 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '17 at 22:08
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3460
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 161
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 373
43% 334 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 361A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 50.4
34% 43.8 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 49
Splatting 36.1
37% 46.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 523
Write 273
Mixed 338
83% 378 MB/s
4K Read 7.72
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 6.16
31% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 4.8
35% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 029E VS2GB1333D3 029E VS2GB1333D3 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $301
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback