Dell OptiPlex 790

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 790
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 790  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111124
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 20:26
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$189
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 471
54% 420 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.7% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 35.5
33% 43.3 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 45.9
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
544GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 229 240 242 236 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.2% Good
Read 252
Write 235
Mixed 234
SusWrite 224
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 30.2
97% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 202
152% 202 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 115%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
303GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 76.5
Write 86.8
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 84.4
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate Expansion+ 500GB
408GB free
Firmware: A200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 18
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 9.4
14% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.5 9.3 9.6 9.4 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 31
Write 21
Mixed 20
SusWrite 9.5
15% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 98%
Seagate External Drive 160GB
39GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.2 9.2 9.1 9.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
9.55% Terrible
Read 30
Write 20.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 9.1
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 16%
Maxtor OneTouch 250GB
16GB free, PID 7350
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.2 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Read 31.5
Write 20.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 9.1
24% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNHC 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 9 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3499 HP VH240a
Typical OptiPlex 790 Builds (Compare 5,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 790

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback